Re: Oracle Forms 6i & Win2000 & Citrix

From: Van Messner <vmessner_at_bestweb.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 22:28:33 GMT
Message-ID: <lmyY5.132$g43.12696_at_newshog.newsread.com>


[Quoted]     Barbara's suggestion sounds right. As a long shot, what you are finding [Quoted] may possibly be related to a problem in Designer 6i. Anything having to do [Quoted] with fetching data runs very, very, very slowly. Opening a server model [Quoted] diagram with 70 tables takes over three minutes on a P600 with 500M of RAM [Quoted] and plenty of hard disk (The same diagram opens in version 6 in a few seconds on a smaller slower computer). We asked Oracle support and at first [Quoted] they said there was no problem. Eventually we were given a copy of an [Quoted] internal note that the problem exists and is severe. In the case of Designer 6i there is no workaround other than to wait for a fix. The fix [Quoted] was first promised for late November but now is uncertain.

Van

"Barbara Kennedy" <barbken_at_teleport.com> wrote in message news:kLsY5.6110$g77.700275_at_nntp2.onemain.com...
> Is forms 6i a 16 bit application or 32 bit on Windows? If it is 16 bit
 then
> that is your problem. WTS does not handle 16 bit apps well and eats up all
> the CPU. You could confirm this by bringing up the task manager and
 looking
> at the cpu level on the third tab.
> Jim
> "tbramlet" <tbramlet_at_fairway.com> wrote in message
> news:%aaY5.2115$Gk5.240785_at_news.uswest.net...
> > We are testing Forms 6i (6.0.8.10.3) on Windows 2000 Server - SP1 and
> > Citrix Metaframe. Server is Dual Processor Pentium 733 with 512MB of
 ram.
> >
> > When running our Forms application on the Windows 2000 server we are
 seeing
> > poor performance whenever database requests are being made from the
> > application to the database server.
> >
> > We setup a Windows 2000 Professional PC next to the Windows 2000 Server
 and
> > are seeing exceptional performance on the PC.
> >
> > We are unable to figure out why the Win2000 Citrix Server is performing
 so
> > poorly.
> >
> > Any ideas???
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Sat Dec 09 2000 - 23:28:33 CET

Original text of this message