Re: Any experience with Oracle 0040 with VB?
From: Norris <johnnie_at_cooper.com.hk>
Date: 8 Sep 1999 01:53:28 GMT
Message-ID: <7r4fio$m9r2_at_imsp212.netvigator.com>
:> ADB/OLE-DB is good if you connect to SQL Server. But if you are using
:>
:> In comp.databases.oracle.misc GAB <news3_at_baxnet.net> wrote:
:> > Has anyone ever had any experience with 0040? Why would I use this over
:> > say, ADO? I understand it's OLE, or OLE-DB to be specific. But upon
:> > installation of 0040 from 8.5 (8i), it bombed VB so it won't even start.
:> > (Complains about a corrupt dll).
:>
:> > But the real question is - is Ole-db really that much better? Easier?
:> > More robust? Quicker? Neater? Slicker?
:>
:> > GAB
:>
:> --
:> Have several nice days...
:> ===================================================================
:> Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of the Corp.
:> http://www.ntfaq.com
:> http://www.jsiinc.com/reghack.htm
:> http://www.oconnell.net/Sybase_FAQ
:> http://www.cyberport.com/~tangent/programming/winsock/
:> ===================================================================
Date: 8 Sep 1999 01:53:28 GMT
Message-ID: <7r4fio$m9r2_at_imsp212.netvigator.com>
I think we still require to deploy net8 no matter we use ODBC, OLE-DB or OO4O.
Todd Hobdey <hobdey_at_bmhc.com> wrote:
: I haven't done a head-to-head comparison. I'm using OO4O 2.3.0.2.0 in a VB6 : project of mine. It works just fine, but I hate the distribution of Oracle : components. Anyone got an easy way to distribute Net80 and OO4O from, say, : InstallShield? Just copying the hundreds of required Oracle files, : including tnsnames.ora, to a user's hard drive seems quite heavy handed and : clunky. : Norris <johnnie_at_cooper.com.hk> wrote in message : news:7r25b9$2lfs$1_at_adenine.netfront.net...
:> ADB/OLE-DB is good if you connect to SQL Server. But if you are using
: oracle database, I think Oracle Object for OLE is much better. For example : the support of PL/SQL is good in OO4O. I have installed OO4O from 8.0.5 : (2.3) and 8i (8.1.5). It runs fast in Excel but I haven't compared with ADO : (2.1) which I think it is still immature. There are still a lot bugs and : limitations need to improve
:>
:> In comp.databases.oracle.misc GAB <news3_at_baxnet.net> wrote:
:> > Has anyone ever had any experience with 0040? Why would I use this over
:> > say, ADO? I understand it's OLE, or OLE-DB to be specific. But upon
:> > installation of 0040 from 8.5 (8i), it bombed VB so it won't even start.
:> > (Complains about a corrupt dll).
:>
:> > But the real question is - is Ole-db really that much better? Easier?
:> > More robust? Quicker? Neater? Slicker?
:>
:> > GAB
:>
:> --
:> Have several nice days...
:> ===================================================================
:> Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of the Corp.
:> http://www.ntfaq.com
:> http://www.jsiinc.com/reghack.htm
:> http://www.oconnell.net/Sybase_FAQ
:> http://www.cyberport.com/~tangent/programming/winsock/
:> ===================================================================
-- -- http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/Received on Wed Sep 08 1999 - 03:53:28 CEST