Re: RAW vs. Std. FileSystem
From: David Sisk <davesisk_at_ipass.net>
Date: 1998/11/26
Message-ID: <Q0V62.713$kx1.630_at_news.ipass.net>#1/1
Date: 1998/11/26
Message-ID: <Q0V62.713$kx1.630_at_news.ipass.net>#1/1
Note quite correct. OPS runs against shared disk, whether raw or cooked.
-- David C. Sisk http://www.ipass.net/~davesisk/ORACLEonNT.htm Oracle wrote in message <73flun$rbs$1_at_oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...Received on Thu Nov 26 1998 - 00:00:00 CET
>(1) performance is 20% better than normal devices
>(2) the only choice for parrellel sever.
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>A couple of questions.
>>
>>1. Is it true that most of the worlds VLDBs use RAW devices to store the
>>physical files?
>>2. Does Oracle recommend RAW devices for VLDBs?
>>
>>Any input welcome.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Rowan.
>>--
>>The opinions expressed are mine and not of my company.
>>
>>
>
>
>