Re: Dev2K Rel. 2.1/2.0

From: <rtgraf_at_sintec.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:10:19 GMT
Message-ID: <6uftmr$ltd$1_at_nnrp1.dejanews.com>


In article <360A140C.2A0EF956_at_dd.ru>,   "Valery A. Sorokin" <vsorokin_at_dd.ru> wrote:
> Production (Runtime) environment of Developer 2.1 is stable enough.
> But in Development environment there are some problems, which can
> solved easy. This problems already discussed in this group.
>
> It's my opinion only.
>
> We have and use production release of Developer 2.1 about half year.
>
> Good Luck.
>
> nando wrote:
> >
> > To all those that have used Developer Release 2.1 and 2.0(Forms 5.0 and
> > Reports 3.0), I would like to know your opinions on how stable the
> > products are. My company is looking to upgrade applications from Dev
> > 2000 1.1(Forms 4.5, Reports 2.5) and Forms 4.0, Reports 2.0 to the new
> > releases.
> >
> > How long have Developer 2.0 and 2.1(Forms 5.0 and Reports 3.0) been
> > production ?
> >
> > Are people having major problems using these fairly new releases ?
> >
> > Any other comments much appreciated.
> > Thanks
>
> --
> Valery A. Sorokin
> ProSoft, Russia, Moscow, Information Systems Division
> Phone: +7 (095) 234 0636 (6 lines) FAX: +7 (095) 234 0640
> E-mail: vsorokin_at_dd.ru OR vsorokin_at_prosoftmpc.msk.su
> http://www.dd.ru
>

Can't say very much about Dev2K R 2.1 other than the following:

We use Designer/2000 Rel. 2.1 together with Dev2K R 2.1 and experience serious problems. A patch Release 2.1.1 for Designer/2000 is out but will not help very much according to discussions on Oracle's DevConnect forum.

Regards,
Robert.

--
Robert Graf-Waczenski e-mail: rtgraf_at_sintec.de
Visit our web site!   http://www.sintec.de

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Received on Fri Sep 25 1998 - 13:10:19 CEST

Original text of this message