Re: Dev/2000 1.3 Experience?

tquan_at_ibm.net (Tony Quan) writes:
>In article <ismo.852121215_at_sasu1>,ismo_at_sasu1.carelian.fi (Ismo Tuononen) wrote:
>>Dan Townsend <townsend_at_ebmud.com> writes:
>>
>>>We have been planning to upgrade from Dev2k 1.2 to 1.3 to get away from
>>>some serious bugs. Most of our clients are still Win31, so we have
 ...
>>I have been using Dev2k 1.3 32-bit in Win95 now about 4 weeks, and it works
>>quite fine (I believe as fine as something can work in Win95, I hope that
>>they soon port Dev2k to unix).
>>
>>Ismo
 

>Developer/2000 has always been available on UNIX. It's available on all
>the major UNIXes I can think of (Sun, DEC, IBM, HP, Intel-based...)
 

>--Tony
>tquan_at_ibm.net

My mistake, sorry. Oracles product names are just a litte confusing, I have Designer/2000 1.3(32-bit), Developer/2000 Reports Designer (32-bit) and Developer 2000/Forms Designer (32-bit) (But i thing forms designer is 4.5.7.0.10?).

So I was hoping that oracle soon ports Des2K to unix.

Ismo Received on Sun Jan 05 1997 - 00:00:00 CET