Re: why not mysql revisited

From: jeremy <jeremy0505_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:37:01 +0100
Message-ID: <MPG.336018cb3af5979e989720_at_news.individual.net>


In article <od4vm6$90e$1_at_dont-email.me>, wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au says...
>
> On 13/04/2017 6:38 _at_wiz, jeremy wrote:
>
> >> site, Oracle may definitely be too expensive. So, the question is what do
> >> you need your database for? And another very important question: what
> >> color do you need that database to be? I suggest mauve, it takes least
> >> RAM.
> >
> > Why such a sarctastic response?
> >
> > Everyone knows that taupe is the least RAM-intensive colour.
> >
>
> Nonsense!
> Anything other than plaid tartan is proof of irresponsible wastage!

[Quoted] Until now, and for very many years I might add here on cdos, you have had my respect and I have held your opinions in high regard. How the mighty are fallen.

Tartan.

-- 
jeremy
Received on Tue Apr 18 2017 - 14:37:01 CEST

Original text of this message