Re: Non-CDB architecture is deprecated
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:24:06 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2015.01.23.20.24.37_at_gmail.com>
>> https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/UPGRD/deprecated.htm#BABDBCJI
>>
>> It looks like we will all have to adopt PDB's and CDB's. It may be an
>> attempt of yet another price hike.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mladen Gogala The Oracle Whisperer http://mgogala.byethost5.com Je suis
>> Charlie Brown
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:24:06 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2015.01.23.20.24.37_at_gmail.com>
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:52:29 -0800, joel garry wrote:
> On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 6:55:38 AM UTC-8, Mladen Gogala wrote:
>> https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/UPGRD/deprecated.htm#BABDBCJI
>>
>> It looks like we will all have to adopt PDB's and CDB's. It may be an
>> attempt of yet another price hike.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mladen Gogala The Oracle Whisperer http://mgogala.byethost5.com Je suis
>> Charlie Brown
> > Could be, but with all the hype and blather about some two-processor > solution, at some point reality may intrude for customer site database > pricing. But reality won't affect the hype. > > jg
Joel, you probably know the basic principle of the scientific research: "One should never discard a good theory just because of the contradicting facts". One should rephrase that for the sales people because principles are the same.
-- Mladen Gogala The Oracle Whisperer http://mgogala.byethost5.com Je suis CharlieReceived on Fri Jan 23 2015 - 21:24:06 CET