Re: 10.2.0.4

From: hpuxrac <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:10:24 -0700
Message-ID: <1189811424.310184.229070@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>

On Sep 14, 7:04 pm, Mladen Gogala <mgogala.SPAM_ME...._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:47:49 -0700, hpuxrac wrote:
> > Wonder how much effort will oracle put into pushing out 11g onto other
> > plaforms that have no 11g release yet while skipping things that should
> > be fixed in supported versions on some platforms that don't yet have an
> > 11g release.
>
> Did you notice that there aren't any patches for 11.1.0.6? MetaLink
> knows nothing about this version, you can't open an SR for that version.
> If there is a problem, we are screwed. Given the horrors with 10.2.0.3,
> I am not at all very convinced that is very well tested. Chuck Phillips
> had a really good show, though.

.

Testing? Why bother testing patchsets before pushing them out to what used to be reliable platforms

Who is Chuck Phillips ( confused ) ? Received on Fri Sep 14 2007 - 18:10:24 CDT