Re: Who is Mladen Gogala?

On May 15, 2:03 pm, Ed Prochak <edproc..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 11, 5:56 pm, dbaplusp..._at_hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 10, 11:54 am, Ed Prochak <edproc..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 9, 5:53 pm, dbaplusp..._at_hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > On May 9, 1:09 pm, Ed Prochak <edproc..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > []
>
> > > > > And as far as I can see has only ever posted questions (or trash) in
> > > > > this newsgroup.
> > > > > You can claim whatever you like behind a pseudonym. I will consider
> > > > > your posts unreliable since they cannot be verified independently.
>
> > > > > Have a nice day.
> > > > > Ed
>
> > > > Ed:
> > > > Trash, you are talking about your posts.
>
> > > Ah, the childish retort: "I didn't do it, you did it." It fits your
> > > style.
>
> > > > Lots of people in internet use psuedonym. My posts have lot more
> > > > credibilty than yours.Let people decide for themsleves what they think
> > > > of Malden, Sybarnd and others. It is ovious that you do not want
> > > > people to get this infomration.
>
> > > 1. It is a hell of a lot easier in technical forums such as this to
> > > earn respect by being open. That openness starts with names. You see
> > > the problem with using a psuedonym in usenet is that it is the first
> > > line of defense of trolls and spammers. It doesn't immediately lump
> > > you in that group, but it doesn't help. Even including a real name in
> > > the post is a positive step in the right direction. The ones you are
> > > targetting respect the readers here to post their real names. Can you
> > > say the same?
>
> > > 2. I always let the readers decide if my comments are useful or not.
> > > Your personal claims of credibility carry little weight I think with
> > > readers here.
>
> > > 3. Obviously I am not stopping anyone from reading any information
> > > they want, so I guess your mindreading scanner is busted.
>
> > > All I can say is you have a choice. You can continue your childish
> > > tantrums or you can take a deep breath and start acting like a mature
> > > adult. Even those you currently regard as evil enemies would welcome
> > > such a change in attitude.
>
> > > It's your choice.
> > > Ed
>
> > Howard Rogers used pseudonym for many years. hupuxrac uses pseudonym.
>
> hupuxrac and others have built their respect by being polite and
> respectful to others.
>
> > Many others do.
> > Using psudonym does not make anyone less credible.
>
> But as I said, it does not help your case. You look like a troll (by
> using a pseudonym and not choosing to post a real name), you act like
> a troll by slandering others, and you dig deeper into trolldom by
> personal attacks rather than reasoned logical arguments or supporting
> evidence.
>
> 1. IF you had evidence of racism you could find the post in google and
> provide the link.
>
> 2. IF you had evidence of contributing something back to this group
> (posting some answers rather than only questions), then you could show
> us that too.
>
> Lacking 1 or 2 your reputation here spirals down lower and lower.
>
> Ed Prochak- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I thought you can do google search. Below are links. I am sure you will come with some explanation that these are not racist remarks.

http://www.thescripts.com/forum/thread64148.html

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.oracle.server/browse_thread/thread/3b0ca8120594635a/4b595aa738be63eb?lnk=gst&q=sybrand+you+indians&rnum=3#4b595aa738be63eb

Read this link (sonewhere towards middle or so, Sybrand starts showing his racial attack:
Sybrand Bakker <gooidit..._at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message > By flaming me in this fashion and agreeing with the Niemic and
> You have also clearly demonstrated now that Indian Oracle 'experts'
> indeed are arrogant idiots, just like yourself.

> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Tue May 15 2007 - 17:11:26 CDT