Re: Who is Mladen Gogala?

On May 11, 5:56 pm, dbaplusp..._at_hotmail.com wrote:
> On May 10, 11:54 am, Ed Prochak <edproc..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 9, 5:53 pm, dbaplusp..._at_hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On May 9, 1:09 pm, Ed Prochak <edproc..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > []
>
> > > > And as far as I can see has only ever posted questions (or trash) in
> > > > this newsgroup.
> > > > You can claim whatever you like behind a pseudonym. I will consider
> > > > your posts unreliable since they cannot be verified independently.
>
> > > > Have a nice day.
> > > > Ed
>
> > > Ed:
> > > Trash, you are talking about your posts.
>
> > Ah, the childish retort: "I didn't do it, you did it." It fits your
> > style.
>
> > > Lots of people in internet use psuedonym. My posts have lot more
> > > credibilty than yours.Let people decide for themsleves what they think
> > > of Malden, Sybarnd and others. It is ovious that you do not want
> > > people to get this infomration.
>
> > 1. It is a hell of a lot easier in technical forums such as this to
> > earn respect by being open. That openness starts with names. You see
> > the problem with using a psuedonym in usenet is that it is the first
> > line of defense of trolls and spammers. It doesn't immediately lump
> > you in that group, but it doesn't help. Even including a real name in
> > the post is a positive step in the right direction. The ones you are
> > targetting respect the readers here to post their real names. Can you
> > say the same?
>
> > 2. I always let the readers decide if my comments are useful or not.
> > Your personal claims of credibility carry little weight I think with
> > readers here.
>
> > 3. Obviously I am not stopping anyone from reading any information
> > they want, so I guess your mindreading scanner is busted.
>
> > All I can say is you have a choice. You can continue your childish
> > tantrums or you can take a deep breath and start acting like a mature
> > adult. Even those you currently regard as evil enemies would welcome
> > such a change in attitude.
>
> > It's your choice.
> > Ed
>
> Howard Rogers used pseudonym for many years. hupuxrac uses pseudonym.

hupuxrac and others have built their respect by being polite and respectful to others.

> Many others do.
> Using psudonym does not make anyone less credible.

But as I said, it does not help your case. You look like a troll (by using a pseudonym and not choosing to post a real name), you act like a troll by slandering others, and you dig deeper into trolldom by personal attacks rather than reasoned logical arguments or supporting evidence.

1. IF you had evidence of racism you could find the post in google and provide the link.
2. IF you had evidence of contributing something back to this group (posting some answers rather than only questions), then you could show us that too.

Lacking 1 or 2 your reputation here spirals down lower and lower.

  Ed Prochak Received on Tue May 15 2007 - 13:03:47 CDT