Re: Problem with dynamic statement in bash

From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp_at_invalid.invalid>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:30:27 +0000
Message-ID: <p3tdg4$dp9$1_at_dont-email.me>


On 19/01/18 18:18, John Levine wrote:
> In article <p3t3sf$4dc$1_at_dont-email.me>,
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp_at_invalid.invalid> wrote:

>> PHP is a toy language: its OK for fast hacks on web pages but not for
>> serious code...

>
> The people who run Wordpress and Wikipedia would doubtless find your
> assertions to be amusing.

They ought to find them CHILLING. Wordpress is, after Joomls, the most hacked CMS in the world

>

>> PERL? well sinec all the 'PERL gurus'; I ever met were wankers who
>> couldnt code, I never felt interested to learn it.

>
> Your loss.

My gain.

>

>> Python is apperntly ammost useable, if you must have an interpreted
>> langauge with its implicit garbage [collection] [not].

>
> Ah, we're opining on languages we don't know and have never used. Well,
> then, let me put in a plug for COMIT and INTERCAL. They were great.
>

[Quoted] No, I was commenting on PHP which I use, extensively. Its a toy language. OK for simple scripts on a website.

And PERL, which was all the rage amongst my employees in the 90s

None of them ever produced any useable code in it though.

Wheras the C gurus produced stuff that worked.

> R's,
> John
>
> PS: Other comments about bash are on the right track. You can write all sorts of useful
> stuff but you have to be very careful about quoting and variable expansion.
>

There comes a point where with any complexity, its simpler to write it in C.

Why fight a langauages idosyncracies?

-- 
It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain
Received on Fri Jan 19 2018 - 19:30:27 CET

Original text of this message