Re: using the same field to be set in the update query and in the where clause

On 11/03/17 19:53, Luuk wrote:
> On 11-03-17 20:37, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Luuk wrote:
>>> and what i use is a perfectly valid mailbox specification.
>>
>> “mailbox specification” is a reference to *the* mailbox specification (in
>> RFC 5322), not your personal private idea of it.
>>
>> Besides, it is anti-social behavior to block the private channel of
>> Usenet
>> beforehand.
>>
>
> ah, you wanted to contact me privalty?
> about what, if i may ask?

$ whois invalid.lan
No whois server is known for this kind of object.

$ dig any invalid.lan

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-3ubuntu0.13-Ubuntu <<>> any invalid.lan
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 38902
;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 0, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.1.1#53(127.0.1.1)

-- 
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will 
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such 
time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic 
and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally 
important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for 
the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the 
truth is the greatest enemy of the State.

Joseph Goebbels