Re: OT: the natural philosopher misses the point

On 18/02/17 09:40, J.O. Aho wrote:
> On 02/18/17 09:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 17/02/17 18:49, J.O. Aho wrote:
>>> On 02/17/17 07:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>
>>>> A staggering example of the right answer to an entirely different
>>>> question????
>>>
>>> And your contributions value? 0?
>>>
>> No. My contribution is to point out that the supplied solution was of
>> zero value to the poster, since it was not an answer to the question he
>> posed.
>>
>> I.e. it was a contribution of zero value.
>>
>>
> It was a reply to his follow up question, but I guess you missed that
>
it wasn't a reply to that either

Do you know what a regexp is?

-- 
“it should be clear by now to everyone that activist environmentalism 
(or environmental activism) is becoming a general ideology about humans, 
about their freedom, about the relationship between the individual and 
the state, and about the manipulation of people under the guise of a 
'noble' idea. It is not an honest pursuit of 'sustainable development,' 
a matter of elementary environmental protection, or a search for 
rational mechanisms designed to achieve a healthy environment. Yet 
things do occur that make you shake your head and remind yourself that 
you live neither in Joseph Stalin’s Communist era, nor in the Orwellian 
utopia of 1984.”

Vaclav Klaus