Re: ASM vs ACFS for 18.7 on X8-2M ODA

From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:57:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CAORjz=ML3u3xHhE0BxGuq6K2aFduXSF3EgsvWuahjmM9VAHO4g_at_mail.gmail.com>



FYI, this is an excellent ASM book

https://www.amazon.com/Database-Cloud-Storage-Management-McGraw-Hill-ebook/dp/B00D86FWO2

Hoping it gets updated for Filter Driver.

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 17:07 Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jack!
>
> ACFS is a cluster file system which runs on top of a cluster volume
> manager, namely ASM. Most of other, competing cluster file systems like
> GPFS, GFS or NTFS run on top of a cluster volume manager. File system is
> much more practical than volume manager devices because you can use OS
> utilities like tar, cp, find or ls. The price you pay for that practicality
> is another software layer on top of the volume manager. The main reason for
> abandoning OCFS2 was the fact that it was open source and could have
> potentially been used by competitors. Bill Long, the author of the first
> and only ASM book that I am aware of, has explicitly said so in his book.
> ACFS is a completely proprietary file system and such danger doesn't exist.
> I have tested ACFS on version 12.2 and have yet to rebuild my cluster on
> the version 19.5. Version 18c is a dead end and I wouldn't use it without
> having a very good reason.
>
> As far as the cluster file systems go, ACFS is a very decent one and
> performs really well. The performance penalty you pay is not steep and you
> get the versatility of an excellent cluster file system. I am all for ACFS.
>
> Regards
>
>
> On 12/13/19 3:13 PM, Jack Applewhite wrote:
>
> We just got our two new X8-2M ODAs installed and are debating whether or
> not to use ACFS. We had to do so on the X5s we're migrating from, but I
> never have liked the idea of the ACFS layer on top of ASM, especially for
> DB files. I've looked back and found various arguments, but they seem tied
> to more-or-less specific architectures. These X8s are standalone, bare
> metal, non-HA servers, so none of the RAC-ready junk we had to deal with in
> the X4s and X5s.
>
> I'm pushing for only ASM for DBs, but maybe an ACFS filesystem for regular
> OS files.
>
> What are some experiences, recommendations, pointers for us to consider?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Jack C. Applewhite - Database Administrator
> Austin I.S.D. - MIS Department
> 512.414.9250 (wk)
>
> I cannot help but notice that there is no problem between us that cannot
> be solved by your departure. -- Mark Twain
> Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including all attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
> student and/or employee information. Unauthorized use of disclosure is
> prohibited under the federal Family Educational Rights & Privacy Act (20
> U.S.C. §1232g, 34 CFR Part 99, 19 TAC 247.2, Gov’t Code 552.023, Educ. Code
> 21.355, 29 CFR 1630.14(b)(c)). If you are not the intended recipient, you
> may not use, disclose, copy or disseminate this information. Please call
> the sender immediately or reply by email and destroy all copies of the
> original message, including attachments.
>
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> Database Consultant
> Tel: (347) 321-1217
>
> --
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist Principal Consultant at Pythian
Pythian Blog http://www.pythian.com/blog/author/still/ Github: https://github.com/jkstill

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Dec 17 2019 - 20:57:21 CET

Original text of this message