Re: Developers wanting individual Unit Test (no data) databases - suggestions?

Well, I would think they would need some data to test everything. It would take some work, but you could create a seed database on a vm template that you could clone and hand out as needed.

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Chris Taylor < christopherdtaylor1994_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Partially would but they're wanting their own individual instances so they
> can run their tests without checking to see if someone else is already
> using the environment.
>
> Chris
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Rich J <rjoralist3_at_society.servebeer.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2017/08/11 12:25, Chris Taylor wrote:
>>
>> We've got a relatively large development group who want to have many Unit
>> Test databases (without data) that they can spin up on demand and destroy
>> when done.
>>
>> I'm curious what products are available that could facilitate something
>> like this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Going in a potentially less-complicated route, couldn't a metadata-only
>> datapump over a network link work for this? One could even have an
>> on-demand Scheduler job to kick it off.
>>
>> Just a thought...
>>
>> Rich
>>
>
>

-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l