Re: New architecture using OVM (was Clusterware)

From: Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:49:06 -0600
Message-ID: <CAJvnOJbTLYE8hx2R5j2ErNd0EGYVw+pii1D_Yz=5OYOWYHZP1w_at_mail.gmail.com>



We have had very good performance using VMware, with IO performance about the same as on a physical server. There is a substantial amount of tuning to do to run Oracle on VM's, but the performance can be quite good. On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:36 AM, ed lewis <eglewis71_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dennis,
> We used them not too long ago, but only in non-production
> environments. The I/O performance we found to be poor with LDOMS.
> They have switched to containers, but I/O is still an issue.
> All of our prod db databases are on physical servers.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dennis Williams" <oracledba.williams_at_gmail.com>
> To: "Stefano Cislaghi" <s.cislaghi_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: "Marko Sutic" <marko.sutic_at_gmail.com>; <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:09 AM
> Subject: Re: New architecture using OVM (was Clusterware)
>
>
> > >
> >> Thanks everyone for your excellent suggestions.
> >>
> >> I've now learned that the Unix (Linux) administrators are interested in
> >> OVM (Oracle Virtual Machines), formerly LDOM. Does anyone have
> experience
> >> in that? They say they've had good luck with that and even deployed a
> >> couple of Oracle DBs on it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Dennis
> >>
> >
> > --
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Jan 18 2013 - 15:49:06 CET

Original text of this message