Re: New architecture using OVM (was Clusterware)

From: ed lewis <eglewis71_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:36:02 -0500
Message-ID: <14F03CB219A64BD49BA4692CCD50079B_at_CATHY>



Hi Dennis,

    We used them not too long ago, but only in non-production environments. The I/O performance we found to be poor with LDOMS. They have switched to containers, but I/O is still an issue.

    All of our prod db databases are on physical servers.

  • Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Williams" <oracledba.williams_at_gmail.com> To: "Stefano Cislaghi" <s.cislaghi_at_gmail.com> Cc: "Marko Sutic" <marko.sutic_at_gmail.com>; <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:09 AM Subject: Re: New architecture using OVM (was Clusterware)

> >
>> Thanks everyone for your excellent suggestions.
>>
>> I've now learned that the Unix (Linux) administrators are interested in
>> OVM (Oracle Virtual Machines), formerly LDOM. Does anyone have experience
>> in that? They say they've had good luck with that and even deployed a
>> couple of Oracle DBs on it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dennis
>>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Jan 18 2013 - 15:36:02 CET

Original text of this message