Re: ASM over SLVM

From: Naqi Mirza <naqimirza_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20061228090714.18839.qmail@web32411.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Original Message ---- From: Naqi Mirza <naqimirza@yahoo.com> To: kevinc@polyserve.com Sent: Thursday, 28 December, 2006 1:56:59 PM Subject: Re: ASM over SLVM Yes, those are some of the features listed in the HP doc's for why SLVM over ASM. Just wondering though, has anyone done this ? The way I described in in my earlier post - is that how it would go down? ----- Original Message ---- From: Kevin Closson <kevinc@polyserve.com> To: oracle-l@freelists.org Sent: Thursday, 28 December, 2006 5:05:14 AM Subject: RE: ASM over SLVM *Each ASM disk group member must be a SLVM raw logical volume *SLVM provides active/standby multi-pathing support for RAC and single instance ("pvlinks") *Leverage cluster-wide device name feature of SLVM that same info from HP says consider using the full oracle stack (ie. no SGe for RAC) when using ASM. any good reasons for using SGe and ASM? ...global device naming alone makes it worth it. Doesn't SLVM also get you some MPIO? Too many things missing in an Oracle-only stack to keep track of -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ___________________________________________________________ Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" – The Wall Street Journal http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu Dec 28 2006 - 03:07:14 CST