Re: Question on Structuring Product Attributes
From: Jan Hidders <hidders_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:57:29 +0100
Message-ID: <530f1a19$0$9231$e4fe514c_at_dreader35.news.xs4all.nl>
>> On 2014-02-25 08:03:51 +0000, Derek Asirvadem said:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> We certainly do. In all cases, thanks for livening things up a bit anyway. :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Obviously. :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Jan Hidders
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:57:29 +0100
Message-ID: <530f1a19$0$9231$e4fe514c_at_dreader35.news.xs4all.nl>
On 2014-02-27 08:02:17 +0000, Erwin.Smout_at_ikan.be said:
> On Thursday, February 27, 2014 2:10:03 AM UTC+1, Jan Hidders wrote:
>> On 2014-02-25 08:03:51 +0000, Derek Asirvadem said:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Tuesday, 1 October 2013 21:59:46 UTC+10, Jan Hidders wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Let me chime in here.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Derek, you and I probably share many points of view and are probably>
>>
>>>> fighting the same fight debunking dbdebunk,
>>
>>> I believe that is the case, yes.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> But we do have some differences as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> We certainly do. In all cases, thanks for livening things up a bit anyway. :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>>> but I'm not cool with your> aggressive wording and think it is
>>
>>>> counterproductive.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Well, maybe I was not clear. I may be aggressive about the lunatics
>>
>>> and asylum dwellers who have written books, mountains of garbage, that
>>
>>> have subverted the Relational Model. The result is:
>>
>>> - what is commonly known as the "relational model" bears very likeness
>>
>>> to the Relational Model
>>
>>> - people are distracted into dealing with the abnormal "normal forms",
>>
>>> and remain ignorant re Normalisation
>>
>>> - millions of people read that tripe and implement convoluted nonsense
>>
>>> in their "databases", firmly believing it to be "relational". Their
>>
>>> grand achievements are crimes against humanity. I will not apologise
>>
>>> for calling them what they are.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Obviously that excludes the people on this forum.
>>
>>
>>
>> Obviously. :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Jan Hidders
> > Hey Jan, > > You have any place where you do your "debunking dbdebunk" in public ? > > The flow of serious material to read has dried up a bit ...
Except here? No, sorry. Was tempted to debate Fabian Pascal on LinkedIn (he's advertising for dbdebunk a lot there lately), but my daytime job is a bit too busy at the moment to get drawn into long debates like that. But it's quite possible I cannot resist the urge to counter his pseudo-scientific nonsense in the near future.
- Jan Hidders