Re: Question on Structuring Product Attributes

On Thursday, February 27, 2014 2:10:03 AM UTC+1, Jan Hidders wrote:
> On 2014-02-25 08:03:51 +0000, Derek Asirvadem said:
>
>
>
> > On Tuesday, 1 October 2013 21:59:46 UTC+10, Jan Hidders wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> Let me chime in here.
>
> >>
>
> >> Derek, you and I probably share many points of view and are probably>
>
> >> fighting the same fight debunking dbdebunk,
>
> > I believe that is the case, yes.
>
> >
>
> > But we do have some differences as well.
>
>
>
> We certainly do. In all cases, thanks for livening things up a bit anyway. :-)
>
>
>
> >> but I'm not cool with your> aggressive wording and think it is
>
> >> counterproductive.
>
> >
>
> > Well, maybe I was not clear. I may be aggressive about the lunatics
>
> > and asylum dwellers who have written books, mountains of garbage, that
>
> > have subverted the Relational Model. The result is:
>
> > - what is commonly known as the "relational model" bears very likeness
>
> > to the Relational Model
>
> > - people are distracted into dealing with the abnormal "normal forms",
>
> > and remain ignorant re Normalisation
>
> > - millions of people read that tripe and implement convoluted nonsense
>
> > in their "databases", firmly believing it to be "relational". Their
>
> > grand achievements are crimes against humanity. I will not apologise
>
> > for calling them what they are.
>
> >
>
> > Obviously that excludes the people on this forum.
>
>
>
> Obviously. :-)
>
>
>
> -- Jan Hidders

Hey Jan,

You have any place where you do your "debunking dbdebunk" in public ?

The flow of serious material to read has dried up a bit ... Received on Thu Feb 27 2014 - 09:02:17 CET