The priority of the idea

From: vldm10 <vldm10_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ccad48b5-3486-4802-8cb5-6cc8e2183fe9_at_z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>



A few days ago I noticed this an interesting correlation between ideas on my website and those on the following: http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2009/11.aspx

   see also:
http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/pages/feature-ctp-walkthrough-self-tracking-entities-for-the-entity-framework.aspx

Microsoft (ADO.NET team) solution has entities states. I also have entity’s states (on my web site www.dbdesign11.com see final version under 4.2.4.1)

ADO.NET team solution has “changing the state of an entity”. I also have a change of a state of an entity (on my web site www.dbdesign11.com see final version under 4.2.4.2)

ADO.NET team solution has Self-Tracking entities. I have identifier of state which identify and determine states of an entities.

These are the most important parts that are needed to create a DB solution for “Temporal” DBs, Historical DBs and some other very complex DBs. I also believe that “history” can be important for parts of an Operating System.
I put the main ideas on my web page in 2005 and have completely integrated them
in this final version in2008.

Comments are welcome
Vladimir Odrljin Received on Thu Dec 03 2009 - 10:13:06 CET

Original text of this message