- Re: Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format! Ben Finney (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 00:13:26 CET)
- Re: Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format! Casey Hawthorne (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 01:04:33 CET)
- Re: Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format! Ben Finney (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 01:19:47 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions compdb_at_hotmail.com (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 03:56:25 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions rpost (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 21:18:56 CET)
- Re: Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format! rpost (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 21:25:59 CET)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Reinier Post (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 23:52:52 CET)
- Last message date: Fri Nov 20 2009 - 23:52:52 CET
- Archived on: Mon Jun 27 2016 - 00:12:20 CEST
|
