Illegal record type while rolling forward from journals
From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 12:17:25 -0500
Message-ID: <4aadnaH6JK-4W5zXnZ2dnUVZ8g2dnZ2d_at_pipex.net>
I have just been shown a log of a rollforward on a 2.6 system that had just been patched. The log showed 8 warnings about "Illegal Record Type 159".
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 12:17:25 -0500
Message-ID: <4aadnaH6JK-4W5zXnZ2dnUVZ8g2dnZ2d_at_pipex.net>
I have just been shown a log of a rollforward on a 2.6 system that had just been patched. The log showed 8 warnings about "Illegal Record Type 159".
What might that be?
Personally I always assume a patch invalidates existing journals and checkpoints but this group is more bold than I am.
In fairness, the log also claims the rollforward completed successfully.
-- Roy UK Ingres User Association Conference 2009 will be on Tuesday June 9, 2009 Go to http://www.iua.org.uk/join to get on the mailing list.Received on Wed May 06 2009 - 19:17:25 CEST