Re: Illegal record type while rolling forward from journals

From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 12:31:37 -0500
Message-ID: <>

Roy Hann wrote:

> I have just been shown a log of a rollforward on a 2.6 system that had
> just been patched. The log showed 8 warnings about "Illegal Record Type
> 159".
> What might that be?
> Personally I always assume a patch invalidates existing journals and
> checkpoints but this group is more bold than I am.
> In fairness, the log also claims the rollforward completed successfully.

Sorry, wrong number. :-)

Roy Received on Wed May 06 2009 - 19:31:37 CEST

Original text of this message