Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 13, 5:03 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 13, 7:00 am, JOG <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 6:34 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > The point was not
> > that AI isn't possible, but that the field went took the wrong
> > approach thinking they could just write down statements of logic put
> > them in a bag, shake it, and somehow robust intelligent behaviour
> > would pop out (If anything surely that's the "mystical" approach).
> Oh. Well I have no problem with that position. The position I
> have problems with is the "AI isn't possible" one.
> My, that post was much easier to produce than the one
> I did yesterday.
Darn. A few minutes earlier would have saved me a lot of typing. Ach well, nothing another brew can't fix... Received on Sun Jul 13 2008 - 18:09:56 CEST