Re: Objectified Relational Mapping
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <970492ee-9500-4aa0-b507-a4ee9c9b4470_at_t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <970492ee-9500-4aa0-b507-a4ee9c9b4470_at_t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
On Jun 9, 10:53 am, "Evan Keel" <evank..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> What the hell is objectivied relational mapping?
I can state with a fairly high degree of confidence that there is no such thing; that exact term probably was first typed in when your client sent you that email; or perhaps when you typed you question.
I can also state with a fairly high degree of confidence that what the term is supposed to be is "object/relational mapping." That is, simply that ol' voodoo that lets OO programmers avoid learning anything while taking very poor advantage of a relational dbms.
Marshall Received on Tue Jun 10 2008 - 07:09:52 CEST