Re: Objectified Relational Mapping

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:16:07 -0300
Message-ID: <484d9d8d$0$4076$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net>


Evan Keel wrote:

> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:484d9325$0$4079$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net...
>

>>Evan Keel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>>>news:484d88c2$0$4064$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Evan Keel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>What the hell is objectivied relational mapping? Can anyone point me to
>>>>>references? I've Googled, but nothing. My client insists that  the db

>
> act as
>
>>>>>an object broker. What does this mean?
>>>>>Thanks in advance...
>>>>>
>>>>>Evan
>>>>
>>>>Search on CORBA and ORB and ODBMS.
>>>>
>>>>Why does your client insist on anything so stupid?
>>>
>>>I just got the email this morning. So before I respond I need to know

>
> what
>
>>>the  heck objectivied relational mapping is.  Is it really stupid?

>
> Thanks
>
>>>Bob for the Googel search terms..
>>
>>It is mostly the impetus for D & D to articulate the Two Great Blunders.

>
> I know Date. Who is the other D? Darwin?

yes, Hugh Darwen

See _The Third Manifesto_

When folks reference D&D around here, they usually mean TTM; even though, the two have collaborated on a lot of other works. Received on Mon Jun 09 2008 - 16:16:07 CDT

Original text of this message