Re: Sigh... the evil that google does...
From: Eric <eric_at_deptj.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 20:14:40 +0100
Message-ID: <slrng21bh0.ep1.eric_at_tasso.deptj.demon.co.uk>
>>> Daniel Pitts wrote:
>>>>> On May 5, 12:30 am, "Bruce C. Baker" <b..._at_undisclosedlocation.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>>> I am finding the spam on google groups making cdt almost unusable...
>>>> Its *much* broader than cdt. cljp, cljg, clc++, to name just a few.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Doesn't have somebody the authority to delete the SPAM??
>>> may be it can be somebody of us?
>>>
>>> Ries
>>>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 20:14:40 +0100
Message-ID: <slrng21bh0.ep1.eric_at_tasso.deptj.demon.co.uk>
On 2008-05-06, Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.spamfilter_at_virtualinfinity.net> wrote:
> Eric wrote: >> On 2008-05-06, rvt via DBMonster.com <u42384_at_uwe> wrote:
>>> Daniel Pitts wrote:
>>>>> On May 5, 12:30 am, "Bruce C. Baker" <b..._at_undisclosedlocation.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>>> I am finding the spam on google groups making cdt almost unusable...
>>>> Its *much* broader than cdt. cljp, cljg, clc++, to name just a few.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Doesn't have somebody the authority to delete the SPAM??
>>> may be it can be somebody of us?
>>>
>>> Ries
>>>
>> >> There is no reliable way to delete a Usenet post. > There are third-party cancel messages. While it doesn't completely > remove the message instantly, it does reduce its visibility significantly. >
Which a lot of news providers won't accept. Received on Tue May 06 2008 - 21:14:40 CEST