Re: Sigh... the evil that google does...
From: Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.spamfilter_at_virtualinfinity.net>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 11:25:20 -0700
Message-ID: <4820a275$0$8226$7836cce5_at_newsrazor.net>
>> Daniel Pitts wrote:
>>>> On May 5, 12:30 am, "Bruce C. Baker" <b..._at_undisclosedlocation.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>> I am finding the spam on google groups making cdt almost unusable...
>>> Its *much* broader than cdt. cljp, cljg, clc++, to name just a few.
>>>
>>
>> Doesn't have somebody the authority to delete the SPAM??
>> may be it can be somebody of us?
>>
>> Ries
>>
>
> There is no reliable way to delete a Usenet post. There are third-party cancel messages. While it doesn't completely remove the message instantly, it does reduce its visibility significantly.
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 11:25:20 -0700
Message-ID: <4820a275$0$8226$7836cce5_at_newsrazor.net>
Eric wrote:
> On 2008-05-06, rvt via DBMonster.com <u42384_at_uwe> wrote:
>> Daniel Pitts wrote:
>>>> On May 5, 12:30 am, "Bruce C. Baker" <b..._at_undisclosedlocation.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>> I am finding the spam on google groups making cdt almost unusable...
>>> Its *much* broader than cdt. cljp, cljg, clc++, to name just a few.
>>>
>>
>> Doesn't have somebody the authority to delete the SPAM??
>> may be it can be somebody of us?
>>
>> Ries
>>
>
> There is no reliable way to delete a Usenet post. There are third-party cancel messages. While it doesn't completely remove the message instantly, it does reduce its visibility significantly.
-- Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>Received on Tue May 06 2008 - 20:25:20 CEST