Re: Object-relational impedence
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <eb3d2eab-4b11-4491-a88a-2c2cc1ec8742_at_i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On 16 mar, 17:05, S Perryman <q..._at_q.com> wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
[Snipped gibberish]
> The concept has always been to present resources physically distributed
> in some manner, for whatever reasons, as though the resources are in fact
> constituent parts of *one centralised* system.
Blah blah blah. It's centralized moron. Can't even spell right.
[Snipped gibberish]
> > That is not abstraction.
>
> Who said it was ??
You moron. By claiming that there could be any abstraction drawn from
a bottom up perspective. By imagining that you could draw any high
level theory from physical systems.
> I think the phrase you're looking for to describe your foolishness is ...
> Pffft.
Not only dumb but also without imagination...Has to copy the Pfff...
You are miserably pathetic.
> Regards,
> Steven Perryman
Received on Sun Mar 16 2008 - 21:27:53 CET