Re: Flash to JOG
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c5e37bb7-0777-42ab-b440-56f8e174d4c1_at_s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 13, 12:36 pm, JOG <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
> I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol
> has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that
> the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a
> necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer
> distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else
> our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no
> programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the
> concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence.
I am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No
indexes, no other access than disk)
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end user view.
See related thread for more info. Received on Sat Mar 15 2008 - 16:32:34 CET