Re: Flash to JOG

On Mar 13, 11:40 am, "David Cressey" <cresse..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> As you decide whether or not to respond to Perryman, please consider that
> there are a several of us who read what you write with interest. We may not
> always agree with you, put you have commanded a level of respect from us
> that makes Perryman's attempt at condescension ludicrous.
>
> You need not descend to his level to defend your reputation with us. And if
> you're trying to raise him to your level, good luck.

I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence. Received on Thu Mar 13 2008 - 13:36:48 CET