Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:26:28 -0400
Message-ID: <47d02945$0$4057$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> I used to work in assembler, a long, long time ago. Perhaps the most
> ambitious project I wrote in assembler was an automatic garbage collector
> for MDL, a programming language in the Lisp family. That was back in 1971.
> I haven't done anything significant in assembler since 1978.
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:26:28 -0400
Message-ID: <47d02945$0$4057$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
David Cressey wrote:
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:47cc8bc8$0$4038$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net...
>
>>David Cressey wrote: >> >>>"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message >>>news:47cc383f$0$4041$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net... >>> >>>>It's pretty obvious to me: object-relational mismatch is to relations as >>>>assembler-object mismatch is to objects. >>> >>>I didn't get this comment. Now that someone else has flagged it as a >>>keeper, I feel the need to ask for an explanation. >> >>What do you know about assembler?
>
> I used to work in assembler, a long, long time ago. Perhaps the most
> ambitious project I wrote in assembler was an automatic garbage collector
> for MDL, a programming language in the Lisp family. That was back in 1971.
> I haven't done anything significant in assembler since 1978.
What part of the analogy leaves you confused, then? Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 18:26:28 CET