Re: Separate PK in Jxn Tbl?
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:43:57 GMT
Message-ID: <6l5gp3hle4cn2lin154h4ip0288b0pgl0v_at_4ax.com>
"Brian Selzer" <brian_at_selzer-software.com> wrote:
>Only an idiot would have a rule for no particularly good reason. Only an
My reasons are, in my opinion, good reasons. Not great but good. You don't like
them? Tough.
>imbecile would follow such a rule. A strong argument can be made for using
>autonumber primary keys--especially if the target DBMS doesn't support FOR
>EACH ROW triggers--but to just blythely add them for no particularly good
>reason is a recipe for disaster.
>can be used and why is critical or you run the risk of a corrupt database.
Umm, not that you care I'm sure but my web pages on Microsoft Access corruptions http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/corruptmdbs.htm are the definitive resource on the web. And there have never been any Access corruptions during to autonumber primary keys that I can recall. And I've likely read just about every posting on that topic in the last eight or ten years in the comp.databases.ms-access and the microsoft.public.access.* newsgroups.
However my knowledge is practical not theoretical.
Tony
-- Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can read the entire thread of messages. Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/Received on Thu Jan 24 2008 - 05:43:57 CET