Re: Useful Unicode

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:31:49 -0400
Message-ID: <47968af6$0$4057$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>


JOG wrote:

> On Jan 22, 11:26 pm, JOG <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
> 

>>On Jan 22, 10:52 pm, mAsterdam <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Bob Badour quoted all of the message, including
>>
>>>>>references: レ
>>>>>references unique: ル
>>>>>masterdam smiley : ☺
>>
>>>to write:
>>
>>>>Refernces and references unique both come out as
>>>>question marks on this end.
>>
>>>If I did not know better, I'd suggest that this
>>>has to do with overzealous twitfiltersettings.
>>
>>>It is remarkable, that the Unicode /does/ come through
>>>nicely in his message, so my real guess is that the
>>>font he uses for display does not have the Japanese characters.
>>
>>Mmmm, I was partly interested in how universal these codes are in
>>getting through people's news-readers. If they are only rendering on
>>google groups it hinders communication somewhat.
> 
> 
> I've checked on thunderbird and firefox, on a mac (naturally...), and
> all is well with the unicode world.

I use netscape with the unicode character encoding. Received on Wed Jan 23 2008 - 01:31:49 CET

Original text of this message