Re: Useful Unicode

On Jan 22, 11:26 pm, JOG <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 10:52 pm, mAsterdam <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Bob Badour quoted all of the message, including
>
> > >> references: レ
> > >> references unique: ル
> > >> masterdam smiley : ☺
>
> > to write:
>
> > > Refernces and references unique both come out as
> > > question marks on this end.
>
> > If I did not know better, I'd suggest that this
> > has to do with overzealous twitfiltersettings.
>
> > It is remarkable, that the Unicode /does/ come through
> > nicely in his message, so my real guess is that the
> > font he uses for display does not have the Japanese characters.
>
> Mmmm, I was partly interested in how universal these codes are in
> getting through people's news-readers. If they are only rendering on
> google groups it hinders communication somewhat.

I've checked on thunderbird and firefox, on a mac (naturally...), and all is well with the unicode world. Received on Wed Jan 23 2008 - 01:14:28 CET