Re: Another view on analysis and ER
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 03:22:50 GMT
Message-ID: <e6o6j.3034$jq2.2361_at_pd7urf1no>
>
> No. Your claim was:
>
> "...the RM already is language-neutral..."
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 03:22:50 GMT
Message-ID: <e6o6j.3034$jq2.2361_at_pd7urf1no>
mAsterdam wrote:
> paul c schreef:
>> mAsterdam wrote: >> ... >>> You made a claim. The mysticism itself is yours - not what you >>> perceive as the explosion of it. >>> ... >> >> The claim was that a relation doesn't have two different headers.
>
> No. Your claim was:
>
> "...the RM already is language-neutral..."
This reminds me of the Monty Python brain surgeon episode, "yes I'm the brain surgeon", "no, I'm not the brain surgeon". I think you are just fooling around, that would be okay if you admitted it. If you are serious, as I said before, "God help us!". Received on Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:22:50 CET