Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:25:21 GMT
Message-ID: <lTe3j.62129$cD.56185_at_pd7urf2no>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:25:21 GMT
Message-ID: <lTe3j.62129$cD.56185_at_pd7urf2no>
Jan Hidders wrote:
...
>
> That's a completely different type of "possible answer" than the one
> I'm talking about in the above. In fact, I'm not even sure how your
> remark relates in any way to what was being discussed here.
I believe that, also that statisticians call the "impossible" answers dirt! Received on Wed Nov 28 2007 - 15:25:21 CET