Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredono_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5f0fb7aa-5200-47e1-8b05-22473a35a0bd_at_f3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5f0fb7aa-5200-47e1-8b05-22473a35a0bd_at_f3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
On 15 nov, 19:13, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Marshall wrote:
> While I have used the term many times in the past, and I am sure I will
> use it many times in the future, seeing this discussion has impressed
> upon me how unimportant "attribute" is as a concept.
>
> The important concepts are tuples, propositions, predicates etc.
I agree. I propose to ditch the term "attribute" and to use "heading element".
Regards
Alfredo
Received on Fri Nov 16 2007 - 12:58:10 CET