Re: atomic

From: Bob Badour <>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:50:32 -0400
Message-ID: <472f65fe$0$14862$>

paul c wrote:

> paul c wrote:
> ...

>> if those make sense, by the D&D definition of "cartesian product", I 
>> think r1 |x| r2 would be empty and I presume so would I(r1 |x| r2).

> Sorry, let me take that back, I think I should have said intersection,
> not cartesian product.

The join is empty. The intersection is empty. If one renamed one of the "car" attributes to something else, the join would have 4 rows. Received on Mon Nov 05 2007 - 19:50:32 CET

Original text of this message