Re: atomic

From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:29:16 GMT
Message-ID: <0kQXi.178598$Da.38157_at_pd7urf1no>


Bob Badour wrote:
> paul c wrote:
>

>> paul c wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> if those make sense, by the D&D definition of "cartesian product", I 
>>> think r1 |x| r2 would be empty and I presume so would I(r1 |x| r2).
>>
>> Sorry, let me take that back, I think I should have said intersection, 
>> not cartesian product.

>
> The join is empty. The intersection is empty. If one renamed one of the
> "car" attributes to something else, the join would have 4 rows.

I think it would have 20! Received on Tue Nov 06 2007 - 03:29:16 CET

Original text of this message