Re: columnstores non relational?

From: David Portas <>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 21:14:10 +0100
Message-ID: <>

"mAsterdam" <> wrote in message news:46e0f150$0$238$
>I couldn't read the article (site was down) which is
> supposed to claim that RDBMSs "should be considered legacy technology.";
> I don't see how the storage stategy necessarily
> affects the relationalness of a DBMS. Nice reads anyway:
> A free columnstore dbms in motion:

The Computerworld headline and the remarks attributed to Stonebraker are hype. He didn't write about the model, he wrote about the implementations of it.

David Portas 
Received on Fri Sep 07 2007 - 22:14:10 CEST

Original text of this message