Re: columnstores non relational?
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 21:14:10 +0100
"mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message
>I couldn't read the article (site was down) which is
> supposed to claim that RDBMSs "should be considered legacy technology.";
> I don't see how the storage stategy necessarily
> affects the relationalness of a DBMS. Nice reads anyway:
> A free columnstore dbms in motion:
The Computerworld headline and the remarks attributed to Stonebraker are hype. He didn't write about the model, he wrote about the implementations of it.
-- David PortasReceived on Fri Sep 07 2007 - 22:14:10 CEST