Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:01:11 -0300
Message-ID: <46729ba2$0$4339$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:01:11 -0300
Message-ID: <46729ba2$0$4339$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
paul c wrote:
> paul c wrote:
>
>> paul c wrote:
>>
[snip]
> Apart from trying to answer your original question, the exercise
> interests me mainly as a way to possibly understand equivalence of two
> relations one of which 'contains' rva's and one which doesn't.
If one contains rva's and the other doesn't, they have different types and cannot possibly be equivalent. One might have a simple expression to construct one from the other and vice versa, but that is a different thing entirely. Received on Fri Jun 15 2007 - 16:01:11 CEST