Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:41:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1181724093.512549.313270_at_q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
On Jun 11, 6:23 pm, Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 jun, 22:23, vldm10 <vld..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello Jan. You can call me Vlado, because it is pretty different from
> > Vadim.
>
> My apologies, I've been away for a while and mistook you for someone
> else.
>
> > I didn't read "NIAM/ORM" and I have started with these ideas long time
> > ago, in my projects. So you can give me some web addresses for these
> > theories and I will read it and tell you my opinion.
>
> See <http://www.orm.net> for a starting point. It's probably the data
> modelling technique / notation with the most research and research
> literature behind it. If you are serious about thinking about a new
> data model you should know it, and probably also about anything that
> goes on in the ER conferences:
> <http://er2007.massey.ac.nz/index.shtml?topics>
>
> -- Jan Hidders
Thank you for these web addresses. I checked "NIAM/ORM" and didn't
find
anything reinvented from my side. Although, regarding that you are
knowledgeable person I would like to know what is in your opinion
reinvented (or looks like it) in my "model". You can roughly present
it or one by one.
Vladimir Odrljin. Received on Wed Jun 13 2007 - 10:41:33 CEST