Re: I. M. John W. Backus
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:57:06 GMT
Message-ID: <mDjMh.13375$PV3.138160_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> No idea how big what he did will turn out to be, but comparing it to the
> IT mumbo-jumbo that increases every day, he should go down as a worthy
> traveller.
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:57:06 GMT
Message-ID: <mDjMh.13375$PV3.138160_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
> mAsterdam wrote:
>
>> mAsterdam wrote: >> >>> Marshall wrote: >>> >>>> ...when did formal methods for describing programming languages >>>> really get started? >> >>> Wikipedia mentions 1956 ( >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_hierarchy ) >>> - and 1959 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backus-Naur_form ) ... >> >> Sadly, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/20/business/20backus.html
>
> No idea how big what he did will turn out to be, but comparing it to the
> IT mumbo-jumbo that increases every day, he should go down as a worthy
> traveller.
It's odd that the obit got things so wrong. Fortran is a monstrosity -- one of those abominable things that was just good enough. It's greatest achievement was to show how not to write a compiler. Backus more than redeemed himself a few years later by learning from fortran how to write a compiler when he and Peter Naur came up with BNF.
Fortran should be a side-note to BNF and not vice versa.
(BNF is a very big contribution--more than enough to share.)