Re: A database theory resource - ideas
From: Walt <wamitty_at_verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:42:24 GMT
Message-ID: <QmRKh.3818$Hb2.1176_at_trndny02>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:42:24 GMT
Message-ID: <QmRKh.3818$Hb2.1176_at_trndny02>
"Bruce C. Baker" <bcbakerXX_at_cox.net> wrote in message
news:JjIKh.108941$Ju2.40511_at_newsfe16.lga...
>
> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1174095163.760210.117980_at_n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 16, 9:58 am, "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> <snippage>
>
> >
> > cheers! --dawn
> >
>
> Dawn, perhaps you could follow JOG's lead and set up your own MV theory
> resourece?
>
> I'm only half-kidding ...
>
Good Idea!
It seems to me that a FAQ and a body of empirical evidence belong in two separate websites. Received on Sat Mar 17 2007 - 13:42:24 CET