Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:17:57 GMT
Message-ID: <991Kh.10580$PV3.107932_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> Well, the statement "instance of an ADT" is not meaningless (it can be
> expressed axiomatically)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:17:57 GMT
Message-ID: <991Kh.10580$PV3.107932_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Daniel Parker wrote:
> On Mar 14, 9:15 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>The word "object" is essentially meaningless. It has no clear definition >>and gets used to mean a variety of things. Those who use it frequently >>do so to impede communication.- Hide quoted text - >>
>
> Well, the statement "instance of an ADT" is not meaningless (it can be
> expressed axiomatically)
What does it mean, though? A variable, perhaps? Received on Thu Mar 15 2007 - 02:17:57 CET