Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view

From: Alexandr Savinov <spam_at_host.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:11:13 +0100
Message-ID: <et6t0g$uqk$1_at_news-a.stw-bonn.de>

Dmitry Shuklin schrieb:

> On 12 ���, 20:56, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> But when I lose pointers I lose instance identity.

>> Yes. One of the biggest advantages of excluding pointers
>> from the model is that you lose instance identity, and all the
>> complexity that comes with it. This is particularly desirable
>> in a distributed context.
>
> Hm, without pointers I will be unable to solve my problems.

Not only you - nobody can solve any problem without pointers (if understood in wide sense as a means of access which also reflects the fact of existence).

--
http://conceptoriented.com

Received on Tue Mar 13 2007 - 20:11:13 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: -CELKO-: "Re: Table/Attribute Modeling"
Previous message: Marshall: "Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view"
In reply to: Dmitry Shuklin: "Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view"
In reply to Marshall: "Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view"
Next in thread: Bob Badour: "Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view"
Reply: Bob Badour: "Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message