Re: Navigation question
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:31:33 GMT
Message-ID: <9XeHh.6998$PV3.62707_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Tony D wrote:
> On Mar 5, 5:25 am, "dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
[ridicule of mumps monstrosity snipped]
> Well, just look at it. The really try telling me there's nothing wrong
> or bad about this. Go on, have a shot at convincing me. Go for it, I'd
> love to see someone try to stick up for this.
>
>
>>If not, then I might finally have my answer.
>
>>If so, is it bad in the same way that it is bad to specify a JOIN in >>an SQL statement
It is bad in the same way as poking out your left eyeball with a sharpened popsicle stick is bad.
> Well, we're nearly 200 posts into this thread, and hopefully there's a
> little inkling that although this might look like a join, it don't
> walk like a join or quack like a join, so it ain't a join.
I thought the ridicule of the mumps code and the mumps advocates stood on its own. If you are going to reply to the troll, please take care to show exactly how absurdly trollish her bullshit really is. However, I believe ignoring the troll entirely will prove far more effective. Received on Tue Mar 06 2007 - 15:31:33 CET