Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: 1 NF
"Sampo Syreeni" <decoy_at_iki.fi> wrote in news:1172733524.671700.195990
@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> By "real" I meant "real valued". Because of that, there's nothing in
> fuzzy set theory you couldn't handle with rather boring and classical
> measure theoretic tools.
Are you saying that the membership function is just another name for the classical measure ?
>
>> >The theory of real functions, measures and the like is then >> > formulated on top of normal ZFC axiomatics. >> >> They cannot be so formulated, because the fuzzy set membership is >> different from the the classical set membership and reducible only in >> the trivial case of the fuzzy membership coinciding with the classical >> membership.
How would you define a degree of truth in classical logic without resorting to any additonal tools which would be cheating ?
How would you define the membership function as measure ?
> We have an extra layer of indirection, yes, but it adds
> little interesting to the overall picture.
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 01 2007 - 12:17:08 CST